The country needs a good human being who also has practical ideas on how to bring progress and positive change
As the whole country views on television and reads in 
every newspaper the battle between Mr. Narendra Modi and Mr. Rahul 
Gandhi, I am only worried that we have actually come to this. We don’t 
care anymore about thought, kindness, honesty, action, responsibility, 
courage, leadership. We have one person who refuses to answer any 
question on the blood on his hands as Chief Minister and another who is 
being projected as a mature philosopher when we actually need a dynamic 
leader.
Recently at one of his many public 
appearances, Mr. Modi was asked whether he would take moral 
responsibility for the 2002 riots, to which he replied that he had 
already answered questions about the riots numerous times. But the same 
man has over the last few months been willing to answer time and again 
the same questions about his developed Gujarat.
Growth and humanity
Every
 time Mr. Modi’s name is discussed, the riots are a part of the 
narrative and the criticism is that we are trapping him within that 
event. But why not? Any person with some human essence must ask those 
questions time and again. Whether or not he was party to the violence is
 up to the courts to decide, but he was the Chief Minister of the State 
and has refused to say that he should have acted differently. How can we
 ever ignore that? In fact we should not. In my travels I have always 
met so many middle class Indians who think Mr. Modi is the Bill Gates of
 Indian politics. “Go to Gujarat and see the transformation, 
development, bridges, roads, IT companies, the speed of decision making 
and you will realise why he is the right person for us.” When I hear 
these statements I am filled with sadness that we as a society can 
easily erase people from our minds. We say that the courts have not 
convicted Mr. Modi, but we readily accuse someone else as being a 
criminal even when no verdict has been proclaimed. Essentially, economic
 growth seems to erase all sense of human decency.
I 
am also told that “after all the Muslims have also voted for him.” 
Honestly, I don’t care if all the Muslims in the world voted for him. I 
care that people died, not Muslims, Christians or Hindus. I am not aware
 of the voting patterns of Gujarat, that’s for psephologists. But I am 
aware that reasons for a minority community to behave in a certain way 
are usually driven by the behaviour of the dominant group. The 
“dominants” manipulate and coerce the weak to act in certain ways. The 
positive economic changes seen in the lives of the majority also 
influences the behavioural pattern of the minority. I am not saying 
these are the reasons but let us just keep this in mind.
We
 as human beings are built to empathise and feel for others. Let us not 
lose sight of this basic quality of humanity in the dream of economic 
comfort or seeming political “stability.” I would rather be poor than 
inhuman! Mr. Modi, I will not stop asking you this: “Will you take moral
 responsibility for the riots?” You owe this country an answer.
Point of trust
While
 this is one end of the political narrative, there exists another in the
 form of a smart, genuine young man who needs to know what he is doing. 
Someone has to tell Rahul Gandhi that he is not a philosopher and India 
doesn’t need one in him! We need a strong individual who is honest and 
willing to show courage. He need not constantly mention the problems of 
the political and bureaucratic class. We are only too aware of its 
failings, and are constantly made aware of them. We do not need a “magic
 wand” but someone with a will to change things and has not until date 
shown any will. Mr. Gandhi has floated thoughts on “what ails Indian 
society.” So, what next? There seems to be a stupor hovering over him, a
 cloud of inertia and intellectual lethargy. The country can ill afford a
 slumber of ideas, courage and determination in a man who is meant to be
 waking the nation up. What one misses in Mr. Gandhi is not earnestness 
of intent, not sincerity, but a crucial breaking of the trust barrier, a
 totally convincing breakthrough in winning the nation’s trust. He can 
fight all his political battles with Mr. Modi or anyone else but first 
he must be willing to fight the battle of his life for this country. 
Unless the nation sees him do that how can it entrust its future to him?
 His advisers don’t seem to see that the absence of a trust breakthrough
 in Mr. Gandhi is what Mr. Modi is cashing in on and substituting with 
his own brand of “I can do it” in surplus. India needs a good human 
being at its helm but also a proactive person with serious, practical 
ideas of how to change this nation. We have in him an exhaustingly long 
prologue; what we need now is the main action.
Watching
 this presidential style battle being played out in the media on an 
everyday basis has only further increased my disappointment in us as a 
society. Urban India is intoxicated by these two people, and the 
so-called “real India” is being manipulated by the same individuals. The
 end result is that India seems to have reached a political cul-de-sac. 
What other options do we have? We can not only look for other options 
but can actually force a change from these two. It is up to us to demand
 decency and human empathy, responsibility-owning from Mr. Modi and 
courage and determination from Mr. Rahul Gandhi. If neither have it in 
them then they don’t deserve our votes, and nor do their parties, bereft
 as they are of ideas for change.
(T.M. Krishna is a Carnatic musician.)



