http://www.epi.org/publication/ib330-productivity-vs-compensation/
Income inequality has grown over the last 30 years or more driven by three dynamics: rising inequality of labor income (wages and compensation), rising inequality of capital income, and an increasing share of income going to capital income rather than labor income. As a consequence, examining market-based incomes one finds that “the top 1 percent of households have secured a very large share of all of the gains in income—59.9 percent of the gains from 1979–2007, while the top 0.1 percent seized an even more disproportionate share: 36 percent. In comparison, only 8.6 percent of income gains have gone to the bottom 90 percent” (Mishel and Bivens 2011).
Income inequality has grown over the last 30 years or more driven by three dynamics: rising inequality of labor income (wages and compensation), rising inequality of capital income, and an increasing share of income going to capital income rather than labor income. As a consequence, examining market-based incomes one finds that “the top 1 percent of households have secured a very large share of all of the gains in income—59.9 percent of the gains from 1979–2007, while the top 0.1 percent seized an even more disproportionate share: 36 percent. In comparison, only 8.6 percent of income gains have gone to the bottom 90 percent” (Mishel and Bivens 2011).
Research covered in this publication will be included in the 12th edition of EPI’s The State of Working America, coming this fall. Click here to read more previews from the forthcoming book.
A key to understanding this growth of income inequality—and the
disappointing increases in workers’ wages and compensation and
middle-class incomes—is understanding the divergence of pay and
productivity. Productivity growth has risen substantially over the last
few decades but the hourly compensation of the typical worker has seen
much more modest growth, especially in the last 10 years or so. The gap
between productivity and the compensation growth for the typical worker
has been larger in the “lost decade” since the early 2000s than at any
point in the post-World War II period. In contrast, productivity and the
compensation of the typical workergrew in tandem over the early postwar period until the 1970s.
Productivity growth, which is the growth of the output of goods and
services per hour worked, provides the basis for the growth of living
standards. However, the experience of the vast majority of workers in
recent decades has been that productivity growth actually provides only
the potential for rising living standards: Recent history,
especially since 2000, has shown that wages and compensation for the
typical worker and income growth for the typical family have lagged
tremendously behind the nation’s fast productivity growth. This paper
uses data from EPI’s upcoming The State of Working America, 12th Edition (Mishel, Bivens, Gould, and Shierholz 2012) to document and explain these trends, particularly those of recent years.
No comments:
Post a Comment